Showing posts sorted by relevance for query jamail. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query jamail. Sort by date Show all posts

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Jesse MacBeth to Winter Soldier: Exposing Dahr Jamail

IVAW’s Winter Soldier Investigation – Iraq and Afghanistan – with Dahr Jamail

This week (Mar 13-16) the Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) will be holding its Winter Soldier Investigation (WSI), patterned on the Vietnam Veterans Against the War event from 1971. That highly fraudulent event became a foundation of the longstanding smear of the Vietnam veterans. IVAW has claimed that it will have testimony provided by its own members as well as Afghan and Iraqi "survivors", and according to The Washington Independent, citing IVAW sources:
"A network of journalists currently in Iraq will reach out to Iraqi civilians in the relevant cities and towns for independent eyewitness accounts."
The members of IVAW do not have those kinds of contacts on their own. Dahr Jamail, who describes himslf as an independent reporter, has demonstrated that he does, identified and unidentified! Jamail, with a longstanding record of pushing claims of widespread American atrocities, also has a record of collusion with the activists of IVAW to get the story as they want it to be! Dahr Jamail will be critical to the success of WSI as the IVAW and their allies define success.

Almost two years ago Dahr Jamail was the most effective promoter of the fraudulent Jesse MacBeth video that charged the U.S. Army Rangers with mass executions of civilians that never happened. On May 21, 2006, Jamail promoted the video extenseively on his website and in his e-mail alerts, writing:
"This 20 minute interview will change how you view the U.S. occupation of Iraq forever. I cannot possibly recommend this more highly. An Iraq war veteran tells of atrocities he and other fellow-soldiers committed regularly while in Iraq. I have never seen this level of honesty from a U.S. soldier who directly participated in the slaughtering of Iraqis."
May 21, 2006
Three days later, by which time IVAW’s MacBeth had been exposed as a fraud, Jamail sought to hide his own promotion of the false atrocity charges by laying the blame for what he had been doing on others:
"Perhaps the most interesting propaganda campaign we have seen in connection to the Haditha Massacre was a massive and coordinated effort on the part of FOX news and the right wing bloggers to discredit any allegations of war crimes along with the entire ‘left wing’ Internet...By far the greatest promoters of the MacBeth video were FOX news and the right wing bloggers."
May 24, 2006
Who is Dahr Jamail?

Dahr Jamail is an American who had grown up in Houston and had been a mountain guide in Alaska prior to the invasion of Iraq. He went to Iraq in 2003 as a self described "unembedded reporter", spending eight months there between November 2003 and February 2005, reporting on what he calls "the occupation". He is the author of "Beyond the Green Zone – Dispatches from an Unembedded Journalist in Occupied Iraq".

About the book, Publishers Weekly wrote:
"…unapologetically dubious of the U.S. government's party line, Dahr sees ‘resistance’ where ‘obedient’ mainstream reporters see ‘insurgents,’ ‘the occupation’ where others see ‘the war.’ Jamail has successfully established a reputation in progressive and radical circles as a journalist who is free from the taint of a ‘compliant corporate media’ and censorship of the military ‘embeds’."
"Beyond the Green Zone" was well received in all the right, or rather, left places, like Mother Jones. That reviewer for Mother Jones, Nick Turse, has been a champion for years of the John Kerry/Vietnam Veterans Against the War charges leveled at the 1971 Winter Soldier Investigation that the American soldiers in Vietnam committed atrocities on a routine and widespread basis.. In "Need A War Crime Story? Call Dahr Jamail", Robin at Chickenhawk Express correctly noted that Jamail has largely "flown under the radar" of the right. He has, however, become well established with the radical left and increasingly with the center left. Jamail writes for far left organs like The Nation and Foreign Policy in Focus, as well as more center-left organs like The Independent, The Sunday Herald and the Guardian. He also reports for The Asia Times, Islam Online and Inter Press Service. He reports on radio and television for Democracy Now! and the BBC. He has his own "Dahr Jamail’s MidEast Dispatches" site on the Net.

Stephen Kinzer, former NY Times foreign desk chief, calls Jamail’s book:
"International Journalism at its best".
Who is Jesse MacBeth?

On May 21, 2006 the video "Jesse Macbeth: An Iraq Veteran Speaks Out" hit the Net, and within little more than a day it caused a firestorm. In the video MacBeth claimed to have been an Army Ranger deployed to Iraq, where his unit had murdered hundreds of men, women and children in and around Fallujah in 2004. MacBeth admitted to having personally killed over two hundred civilians, many of them execution style, saying that his victims would:
"...feel the hot muzzle of my rifle on the forehead."
He recounted how his unit had slaughtered hundreds praying in a mosque, and claimed that the Rangers burned the bodies or hung them from the building’s rafters.

It was sensational stuff, but beyond perhaps his name and acknowledged membership in IVAW, everything MacBeth claimed in the video was a lie. Booted out of the Army after only forty-four days of boot camp, MacBeth was a complete fraud. He was spotted as such almost instantaneously by milbloggers when the video was pointed out to them by skeptics. At the time of the video’s release, MacBeth had been a member of IVAW for months and the IVAW logo appeared prominently in the video. After he was exposed, MacBeth resigned from the IVAW, although even his forty-four days in the military still meets IVAW’s membership criteria.

IVAW, which had had credibility problems with atrocity stories told by other members, within days distanced itself from MacBeth and the video after he was exposed, stating:
"After looking into his recent claims, we have learned that Jesse is not what he represented himself to be. Accordingly, IVAW does not in any way endorse Jesse MacBeth or any of his accounts involving military service. He -- and he alone -- is responsible for them. IVAW was not aware of the creation of the video program featuring MacBeth, and did not authorize use of our logo in the program."
Early last year, MacBeth was convicted of defrauding the VA, and sentenced to jail. There the story seems to have ended, with almost everyone’s position on the matter settled. For many on the right, MacBeth was yet another example of the anti-American and anti-military left typified by IVAW, trying to smear those serving in uniform. For many on the left, the right wing was making too much of one loose cannon in order to undermine stories of real, ongoing and even routine American atrocities. Some on the left speculated that MacBeth was likely a plant by the right to discredit the anti-war left. On all sides, MacBeth is scorned as a loser and worse.

What has not been sufficiently dealt with is how MacBeth came to the attention of the independent activist film makers at PepperSpray Productions in Seattle who made the video and why did they believe he was credible. Further, how was the expertise and contacts available to have the video and the text of the same (almost instantaneously translated into Arabic) disseminated so widely on the Internet? Jesse MacBeth, loser, didn’t do that by himself. Jesse may have been a loose cannon and worse, but MacBeth and his video was an operation, even if an ad hoc one, involving many. It only became the "loose cannon" stunt as a cover when MacBeth was exposed as a fraud.

PepperSpray Productions

The video hit the Net on May 21, 2006. On May 23, 2006, the PepperSpray Productions producer of the video, Randy Rowland, wrote an e-mail about the controversy posted in its entirety at a blog site in New Zealand called Cryptogon.com, as an update to that site’s 5/21/2006 posting (scroll down). What that e-mail reveals from an insider perspective is devastating to the credibility of PepperSpray Productions, IVAW and Dahr Jamail. Rowland provides some history of PepperSpray’s dealings with MacBeth:
"We met Jesse at a rally where he, along with other IVAW members were holding an IVAW banner, giving speeches as IVAW members, and talking to the press. We made arrangements to interview him the next day, which formed the basis of the piece we did. The piece went out on our show, and Terry [Portinga] put the interview part up on his peacefilms.org website."
Rowland was speaking of IVAW events in Tacoma in which MacBeth had marched and spoken. IVAW members and leadership had to have been aware of the kinds of things MacBeth was saying. A month before the video went viral, on April 26, 2006, the Socialist Alternative published an atrocity charge laden interview with MacBeth, identifying him as IVAW. That post’s original content has been deleted, but saved for posterity by quick action at ArmyRanger.com and Shadowspear’s Special Operations Forces Community Forum.

MacBeth had been scheduled (but reportedly didn’t show) to participate as an IVAW representative at the "Halliburton on the Run" teach-in in Oklahoma on May 17, 2006, conducted by After Downing Street, an anti-war left umbrella group. It was MacBeth’s highly visible membership in IVAW that gave him credibility with PepperSpray and others. Rowland’s entire e-mail reads as though PepperSpray had assumed an implied IVAW support for what MacBeth was doing and saying because he was publicly representing the organization. Rowland was also somewhat distressed that PepperSpray could not keep the video up if IVAW did not back MacBeth.

In doing as he was doing, however fraudulently, MacBeth was doing exactly what IVAW expected of its members
"Some things to expect as a member of IVAW:
Requests to speak with the press
Requests for participation in special projects with artists, students, etc.
Requests to participate in/speak at local events"
There may well have been an informal but understood quid pro quo between MacBeth and IVAW. According to the IVAW’s own statement on MacBeth, he had come to them in January 2006 asking for help and IVAW did so in several ways. The IVAW statement phrased that as “Assisting veterans is one of the founding principles of IVAW and it is a mission that we take seriously”. MacBeth had been having trouble getting benefits from the VA, including for his fake PTSD. In the April interview with Socialist Alternative when asked how he had gotten involved in IVAW, MacBeth replied:
“Veteran's Affairs told me they had no money for me.”
IVAW may have been pleased to have MacBeth as an activist, and in return may have carelessly and without due diligence assisted MacBeth, even through contacts, in his attempts to defraud the VA.

PepperSpray’s Rowland recounts in the e-mail that it was only after MacBeth’s claims on the video were being challenged that:
"IVAW asked Jessie yesterday to verify his military service etc, and Jessie did fax them some VA paperwork and his DD214".
IVAW had been giving MacBeth assistance, credibility and a platform for charging Americans with gross atrocities, but only after the video came under skeptical scrutiny did IVAW seek to even verify MacBeth’s claim of service in Iraq! As to disseminating the Jesse MacBeth story over the Net, Rowland’s next line makes clear what happened, and the caps are his:
"Once Dahr sent out the link to the video, there was a LOT of attention on the video. Right away it came under attack for being lies."
Months before the MacBeth video, PepperSpray Productions was producing Dahr Jamail videos, with English and Arabic, such as "Eyewitness in Iraq: Dahr Jamail, an Unembedded Report" and "Testimonies from Falluja".

During the two days it took to convincingly expose Jesse MacBeth as a fraud, Dahr Jamail was the preeminent and most effective promoter of the MacBeth video, getting it out to both English and Arabic sites (scroll down to the Jamail quotes for May 21, 2006 in both languages). When MacBeth was exposed in short order, Jamail sought to conceal his part in that promotion by blaming that promotion on "the right".

A Talking Point Memo on Haditha?

The MacBeth video was released only a few days after Congressman Murtha publicly accused several Marines of killing civilians in "in cold blood" at Haditha. While the media was rife with now debunked fantasies about execution style killings and revenge rampages by the Marines, Dahr Jamail and others were intending to ratchet up the idea of wholesale atrocities by American forces, a recurring theme with IVAW also. In the e-mail, Randy Rowland wrote:
"After all, the news these days is about a Marine squad who are accused of exactly this same behavior. Jesse's story would clearly show the Marine story to be common policy, rather than a squad of loose cannons..."
In their reactions to the outing of Jesse MacBeth as a fraud, IVAW, PepperSpray Productions and Jamail all had Haditha on their minds. The uniformity of their responses to the MacBeth controversy comes across as agreed upon talking points. In its "Retraction Statement for our Video ‘Jesse Macbeth: An Iraq Veteran Speaks Out’" PepperSpray had:
"Jesse Macbeth misrepresented to PepperSpray Productions and others his military service and was never deployed in Iraq. We...deeply regret that the Macbeth video distracted attention from the military investigation of a Marines massacre of 24 civilians in Haditha..."
IVAW upped the ante a bit, as posted on May 27th at Daily Kos:
"The timing of the widespread circulation of the MacBeth video interestingly coincides with the ongoing military investigation of the recent Marine massacre of two dozen civilians (including women and children) in Haditha..."
When the word "interesting" appears at places like DailyKos and DU, it works somewhat like the "trigger word" in Manchurian Candidate. Reading that word starts the tinfoil vibrating and heating up as though it was placed in a microwave. Kossack comment after Kossack comment from then on and even other diaries at Kos alluded to Jesse MacBeth being a Rovian-Young Republican plant meant to embarrass the anti-war left like IVAW.

Yet Jamail did both PepperSpray and IVAW one better. While also invoking Haditha, he blamed FOX News and the right blogosphere for promoting the video. Writing on the same day (May 24) that FOX’s John Gibson aired a story on the video and three days after Jamail himself promoted it, Jamail went apoplectic to deflect his involvement:
"FOX 5/24/2006 Propaganda Fabrications Involving Jesse MacBeth Video
Perhaps the most interesting propaganda campaign we have seen in connection to the Haditha Massacre was a massive and coordinated effort on the part of FOX news and the right wing bloggers to discredit any allegations of war crimes along with the entire ‘left wing’ Internet. This campaign came in the form of fraudulent video testimony from Jesse MacBeth...two days before FOX's wild promotion of the MacBeth video, a Google search on Jessie MacBeth revealed only two obscure references to the video at all...By far the greatest promoters of the MacBeth video were FOX news and the right wing bloggers...The video barely made a stir on the web since people questioned its validity within hours."
Jamail’s Promotion of MacBeth: How Extensive?

As the e-mail from PepperSpray’s Randy Rowland showed, it was Dahr Jamail’s linking to the video that suddenly got it "a LOT of attention".

Quoted in Steven Vincent’s "In The Red Zone", Jamail claimed that as early as late 2004, a year and a half before the MacBeth video, his MidEast Dispatches site would get over one million hits per day! If that claim was accurate, not counting Jamail’s e-mail alerts, it is reasonable to conclude that for the two days that he had pushed the video, the number of people who went to his site met or exceeded the daily circulation of the New York Times, the Washington Post or the Los Angeles Times. In that Jamail used the Internet to bring attention to the video meant that some number of those who either went to his site or received his e-mail dispatches passed the information on at blogs and websites, discussion boards or in their own or forwarded e-mail.

The evidence of Jamail’s widespread promotional reach is still on the Net, despite some determined attempt at both clean-up and bait and switch. A Google search turns up numerous sites that quoted Jamail promoting the MacBeth video well before the FOX News story! The depth and breadth of that promotion is impressive, and one can only wonder how much further the false MacBeth claims of American atrocities would have been given play had not the debunking of MacBeth been accomplished so rapidly.

This site, Free Iraq, is in both English and Arabic, and the quotes are from Jamail:
"Video: Jessie Macbeth, a former U.S. Army Ranger admits killing Iraqi civilians in cold blood as normal practice , May 21, 2006
The FULL English transcript of Jessie's testimony.
The FULL Arabic transcript
‘This 20 minute interview with Jessie Macbeth will change how you view the U.S. occupation of Iraq, forever. An Iraq war veteran tells of atrocities he and other fellow-soldiers committed regularly while in Iraq.’
Dahr Jamail’"
The link at that site to Jamail’s website didn’t work because Jamail had deleted his post, but that deleted page can be found on the WayBack Machine, with "Posted by Dahr Jamail at May 21, 2006 08:58 PM", three days before the FOX News report! In his accusations against FOX and the right blogosphere, Jamail said:
"The video was posted on a small, low bandwidth website that could never have handled anywhere near that kind of traffic..."
The site with the video that Jamail linked to in his deleted "Middle East Dispatches" post on May 21st was www.peacefilms.org. By May23rd, ALLAHPUNDIT reported at Hot Air that the MacBeth video had migrated and become available for viewing and even download at Mininova, Information Clearing House and TorrentSpy. It had also migrated to Google Video and YouTube, making a mockery of Jamail's claim about inability to handle high traffic. Jamail disingenuously writes of "two days before" precisely to avoid how far the story spread over those following two days, owing considerably to his own efforts.

The Common Ills Blogspot, May 21st:
"Keesha notes an e-mail sent out to people who sign up for alerts at Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches:
Jessie Macbeth, a Former Army Ranger and Iraq War Veteran Tells All
Watch the video here."
From DailyKos:
"I get emails from Dahr Jamail...he pointed to this video…it was produced by Pepper Spray Productions, who did the video for Dahr of the Fallujah massacre..."
And...
"I diaried this a few days ago based on it having been advanced by Dahr, PepperSpray and IVAW - people and organizations that I respect and trust."
Some of the other sites and feeds that Jamail also reached that either quoted or expressly credited Jamail for the MacBeth linkage can still be found despite the clean-up, including:

Peace, Earth and Justice News
Politics International Iraq
Media With Conscience
NewsVine
Democratic Underground
Siratyst
Aliraqi.org (With still active links to the video and Arabic transcript)
An Arabic Discussion Site
Chimes of Freedom
MyAntiWar.org
The Last Outpost
The Truth Campaign

The quotes of Jamail from his deleted post also made it to various conspiracy sites and others with the video that have had tens of thousands of views. The ChiefBrief blog shows that the Google Video of MacBeth, long gone, was quoting Jamail’s endorsement.

As an example of how the video went "viral" (spread by contact or exposure), the Dissident Voice had this on a now deleted post, fortunately captured by Amy Proctor at Bottom Line Up Front:
"If the [MacBeth] video gets widespread exposure, it is unfathomable that support for a US troop presence in Iraq could be sustained...It is a video that should number the days of the Bush administration...we hear the shaken ex-army ranger and Iraq war veteran Jessie MacBeth admit to the Stygian depths of depravity and evil that US service personnel have sunk…"
The Dissident Voice article with link to the video migrated to Uruk.net (Information From Occupied Iraq), an English-Italian language site. At the top of the page was a request:
"We are looking for voluntary translators from Arabic into English."
Days later, when Dissident Voice had deleted its original post, it offered as explanation for having accepted MacBeth’s lies:
"Upon what did I base my decision to develop the [MacBeth video] article? First, the video was highly endorsed by respected journalist Dahr Jamail...Spending eight months on the ground in post-invasion violence-wracked Iraq as an independent journalist confers credibility; hence, a recommendation from Jamail carries much weight. His website provided a link..."
Last October Jamail was interviewed by Yahoo Picks’ Jill Robinson, speaking of the large volume of subscribers and web traffic his site enjoys:
"The volume of subscribers has surprised me, in addition to the volume of traffic my website receives...The website has been a tremendous help in getting information…out to a larger...Both my site and the Internet allowed me to do an end-run around the standard accepted model of journalism...what has been amazing to me is how much demand there was…in the sense of an extremely large audience of readers who wanted my reports."
Dahr Jamail had less than two days to "move" the MacBeth video (and transcripts) before MacBeth was outed, and then he shut his part of the operation down. He then tried to hide it by charging that others, like FOX News and the right blogosphere, were the ones who had been doing what he had done.

Oddly enough, Jamail used the same resources he used to promote the MacBeth video, his website and e-mail dispatches, to disseminate the charge that it was FOX News and the right that had done so, an irony no doubt lost on the recipients of those e-mails and his website’s readers. Within days the same discussions at Daily Kos and DU that had people speculating and even insisting that MacBeth was a right wing plant shifted gear to claims that it was the right wing promoting the here-to-fore "obscure" video all along. Jamail was apparently so relieved at his success in dodging a well deserved bullet to his supposed journalistic credibility that by June 9 he and Jeff Pflueger wrote "Propaganda and Haditha" in which the claims about FOX News’ and the right blogosphere’s promotion of the MacBeth video was used as an example of right-wing pro-war propaganda methods!

By late in the day on May 23rd, by which time MacBeth was being convincingly exposed as a fraud, Jamail sent out this notice:
"I recently sent out an announcement which brought attention to a filmed interview with Jesse MacBeth. Upon further investigation, I found more questions than answers about the personal history of Mr. MacBeth. I therefore removed this posting from my website."
The investigation Jamail refers to was not his and that "I found more questions..." is simply and clearly a lie. He was not questioning; he was backtracking because others were questioning and investigating. Even on anti-war left sites like Daily Kos and DU there was skepticism about MacBeth’s claims to have been a Ranger and combat experienced soldier, and not only from veterans. Perhaps if Jamail had condescended to have been embedded with the military for a time he might have been able to develop some minimal ability to recognize an actual combat soldier or Army Ranger.

In his May 24 series of accusations against FOX and the right, he had the audacity to write:
"The video barely made a stir on the web since people questioned its validity within hours."
Dahr Jamail used his "credibility" to give that video validity and promote it, without questioning it’s “validity”! Jamail said in the Yahoo Picks interview that:
"…the Internet allowed me to do an end-run around the standard accepted model of journalism".
While even the regular media has often had well documented problems with their standards of verification, in the matter of Macbeth the media that Jamail made an end run around was indeed skeptical, as Jamail was not. From Randy Rowland’s e-mail account of what transpired:
"Some big media people were interested in our video and the Jesse story but they, rightfully so, wanted verification of the story, so they could run with it...it is BIG news, if it can be subjected to the extra-normal journalistic scrutiny needed for really big stories...Big media backed away from the story..."
The video was, however, big news for Dahr Jamail, who is not an unaffiliated and independent journalist. He is, at the least, the proprietor of a media disinformation operation.

His site provides downloads of free audio and video, and links to others, in both English and Arabic, and several are by PepperSpray. His stories have been translated into French, Polish, German, Dutch, Spanish, Japanese, Portuguese, Chinese, Arabic and Turkish. He is a frequent speaker at left and anti-war events and colleges. Lot of credentials, lots of credibility with lots of people, and the proven ability to push a story. He was "promoting" the MacBeth story that he had good reason to know or determine was false! Jamail was supposedly in Fallujah in 2004 at about the same period in which MacBeth had claimed to have participated in the atrocities there! Jamail has contacts in Iraq. Last November at Firedoglake he wrote:
"I have an Iraqi colleague who I continue to do stories with for Inter Press Service. He lives in Fallujah."
Presumably his contact in Fallujah might have been able to verify a story of hundreds killed in a mosque and hung from the rafters.

Credible Independent Journalist or Something Else?

A sampling of Jamail’s other work, in the light of his demonstrated credibility as regards the MacBeth video:

On November 24, 2004, Jamail wrote "Allawi's Dictatorship" for Inter Press Service. Jamail claimed that interim Iraqi Prime Minister Allawi was "following in the footsteps" of Saddam Hussein, and that Allawi ruled "more in the style of the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein than a leader of a supposedly democratic state." The following April the supposed dictator Allawi peacefully and without hesitation handed over his office to the new democratically selected Prime Minister.

On November 26, 2004 Jamail wrote an article for Inter Press Service claiming "The U.S. military has used poison gas and other non-conventional weapons against civilians in Fallujah, eyewitnesses report."

On February 24, 2006 Jamail published "Golden Mosque Bombing – Who Benefits?", with the clear implication that the U.S. was behind the attempt to set off a wave of sectarian violence. Writing in OpEd News on the same day in "Whose Bombs Were They", Mike Whitney had:
"Other prominent analysts including...Dahr Jamail...agree that the Bush administration appears to be inciting civil war as part of an exit strategy."
Two years before, in the interecepted letter written by al-Zarqawi, the leader of AQI wrote of his desire to attack the Shia so as to unleash sectarian violence
"These [Shia] in our opinion are the key to change. I mean that targeting and hitting them in [their] religious, political, and military depth will provoke them to show the Sunnis their rabies …If we succeed in dragging them into the arena of sectarian war, it will become possible to awaken the inattentive Sunnis..."
On April 19, 2006, in "Civil War In Iraq?", Jamail made the charge that the U.S. was backing "a Shia militia invasion of a Sunni neighborhood".

On May 21, 2006, the very same day that Jamail posted that "I cannot possibly recommend this more highly" in reference to the MacBeth video, he also made an earlier post entitled "More Abu Ghraib Photos Posted". This was more than two years after the initial publication of the first such photos. The resurrection of Abu Ghraib photos and the MacBeth video were to build upon Murtha’s Haditha charges and feed the ensuing media frenzy and, it must be said, jihadist and insurgent propaganda and recruiting.
On May 31, 2006, several days after he deleted his post praising the honesty of Jesse MacBeth, Jamail wrote "Countless My Lais in Iraq", claiming:
"The media feeding frenzy around what has been referred to as "Iraq's My Lai" has become frenetic. Focus on U.S. Marines slaughtering at least 20 civilians in Haditha last November is reminiscent of the media spasm around the ‘scandal’ of Abu Ghraib during April and May 2004…countless atrocities continue daily...Torture did not stop simply because the media finally decided...to cover the story, and the daily slaughter of Iraqi civilians by U.S. forces and U.S.-backed Iraqi ‘security’ forces had not stopped either."
On September 5, 2006 Jamail published "U.S. Losing Control Fast", a tremendously pessimistic view (from our side) of the situation in al-Anbar Province. That article contained statements Jamail supposedly received from locals in al-Anbar:
"Eyewitnesses in Ramadi say that the U.S. military recently asked citizens in al-Anbar to stop targeting them, and promised to withdraw to their bases in Haditha and Habaniyah (near Fallujah) soon..."
And...
"Hundreds of local policemen have quit the force after seeing that they are considered a legitimate target by fighters..."
And...
"The U.S. forces seem to have no clear policy in the face of the sustained resistance."
And...
"The U.S. Army seems so confused in handling the security situation in Anbar"
The previous spring and summer the tribes in al-Anbar began to turn from AQI and the insurgency and toward the Americans and our Iraqi allies. The Anbar Awakening, in which the Sunni tribes formally allied themselves with coalition forces against AQI, was comprised of twenty tribes by August 2006, as reported by Michael Fumento. Jamail wrote his article in September, as the Awakening, perhaps the most dramatic and crucial series of events in Iraq in 2006, was kicking into high gear, as Bill Roggio also reported in Long War Journal.

On April 20, 2007, Jamail published "An Interview with a Resistance Fighter", demonstrating perhaps the breadth of Jamail’s contacts and providing a leader of the Ba’athist insurgency a platform to lay the blame for the sectarian violence on the U.S.

On November 11, 2007, in a discussion at the Firedoglake website, Jamail agreed that the Nazi reprisal slaughter of the Czech village of Lidice is "a very accurate comparison" to what U.S. forces did in Fallujah. He also wrote that it is not out of the realm of possibility that the U.S. had dug mass graves for the bodies of illegal alien soldiers in the U.S. military who have been killed in Iraq, so as to keep casualty figures low.

In January of this year Jamail wrote "Killer of U.S. Soldiers Becomes a Hero" for Inter Press Service. Jamail used the Muslim Association of Scholars and a Saddam era Colonel (unidentified as such) as sources in an article for the charge that two American soldiers, Capt. Rowdy J. Inman and Sgt. Benjamin B. Portell, were physically abusing a pregnant Iraqi woman when they were killed by an Iraqi soldier. Jamail did not see fit to name the Americans and gives minimal attention to sources that say otherwise in a very lopsided presentation. Only several weeks before the Sunni religious establishment of Iraq had removed the Al Qaeda supporting Association of Muslim Scholars from the Umm al Quraa mosque in Baghdad, as again reported in Long War Journal. The Washington Post reported that the Association of Muslim Scholars was the source of the charge against the soldiers of abusing a pregnant woman.

Dahr Jamail and IVAW: Ethics vs Expediency

Jamail and IVAW have had a longstanding symbiotic relationship.

In August 2005, several months before the MacBeth video, Jamail was meeting with IVAW members Abdul Henderson, Alex Ryabov, Camilo Mejia, Harvey Tharp, Michael Hoffman and Charlie Anderson. In "What Have We done?" Jamail wrote:
"I type furiously for three hours, trying to keep up with the stories each of the men shared….about the atrocities of what they saw, and committed, while in Iraq."
No details likes events, dates, places and units involved for these supposed atrocities were provide in the article. One of the interviewees was Camilo Mejia, an IVAW leader and the first American soldier who, after serving in Iraq and returning home on leave, refused redeployment. In a March 2005 interview with Amy Goodman, Mejia told of a six hour period in which his unit was guarding detainees, and were ordered to keep them awake and disoriented. He described the methods used as yelling, making loud noises with a sledgehammer, making the detainees get up and sit down, and "if all of that fails then, you know, cock a .9 millimeter gun next to their ear, so as to make them believe that they're going to be executed." When asked if he had done those things, Mejia replied "Not really..."

Months later, while Dahr Jamail furiously typed atrocity stories, that had changed for the IVAW’s Mejia to "I tortured guys..."

Another interviewee, Harvey Tharp, was quoted by Jamail as stating:
“Most of what we’re talking about is war crimes…war crimes because they are directed by our government for power projection.”
Last month Tharp was quoted in the Yemen Times as saying he had never personally witnessed any American atrocities in Iraq, but he had come to “know about certain cases”.

Both Robin at Chickenhawk Express and milblogger Grim at BLACKFIVE took apart a Jamail story from last October published in the Asia Times, under the title "US soldiers shy from battle in Iraq". The article was supposedly about widespread and growing attitudes and behavior with the troops in Iraq. The bloggers pointed out that while the article used four sources, two active duty and two veterans, it only identified two of them as members of IVAW. However, the bloggers found that all four were IVAW members. There are thousands of Army and National Guards troops at Ft. Drum, where the story was written. That Jamail solicited information from only those four demonstrated collusion with IVAW to get the story as they wanted it to be, not independent and credible journalism. That Jamail did not disclose in the story with the hand-picked sources that he served on the advisory board of the IVAW makes that an ethical breach that would likely end the career of any ordinary journalist.

Just last November, when interviewed by Kevin Zeese, Jamail was asked what advice he would give the peace movement and Americans opposed to the Iraq occupation, and he replied:
"I feel the two single greatest things people can do to help end the occupation are to support Iraq Veterans Against the War, and to continue to organize locally. IVAW is the spearhead, I feel, of any movement that will be effective in ending the occupation..."
MacBeth’s Testimony Survives

I had linked to the Free Iraq site, with the Arabic, intentionally. Within hours of the outing of MacBeth as a fraud, numerous sites that carried the video, transcript, MacBeth interviews and/or links to them started a clean-up, including Information Clearing House and Socialist Alternative as well as Jamail’s "Middle East Dispatches".

The video became harder to find. However, that is here, in the English part of the Net. The Arabic text on the Free Iraq site can be copy-pasted into Google. If you spend the time, as I did, Google will take you to sites and translate the Arabic. The translations are poor, but with some persistence you can find that well after the MacBeth story died in English, the Arabic transcript, various versions of MacBeth's claims and no doubt the video were still circulating in the Arabic speaking world. There are Arabic sites that claim MacBeth was speaking the truth, and that his video and credibility was attacked by American government censorship. They make that claim months after it was debunked.

The MacBeth testimony still lives as a recruitment device for those who would kill our troops in revenge. Dahr Jamail and IVAW are both accountable for that. IVAW’s disclaimer about not knowing about the video nor endorsing it, even if true, doesn’t absolve them. IVAW gave MacBeth unwarranted credibility and acceptance when he was telling fables. As Greyhawk of Mudville Gazette put it:
"No veteran could fail to spot MacBeth as a phony - it took about 3 seconds. But IVAW couldn't do it until after he was outed by milbloggers."
IVAW granted credibility to and used, for their own purposes, the Jesse MacBeth that gave that testimony. Dahr Jamail made sure it got circulated where it could so enrage some people that they will strap on a suicide bomb vest or plant an IED and kill our troops. IVAW only sought to verify MacBeth’s service after it was challenged by others, and the "credible" Dahr Jamail tried to pin his own actions on others.

Dahr Jamail’s Verifiers and Winter Soldier

On Feb. 9, The Nation published an interview with Jamail in which Jeremy Scahill said to Jamail:
"You haven't been to Iraq for a number of months, but you are regularly in touch with Iraqis on the ground. In fact, a lot of the articles that you do you co-author with Iraqi colleagues still on the ground. Many of the journalists who do go to Iraq are trapped in the Green Zone-- or what an Iraqi friend of mine calls the Green Zoo. And so, in a way, you may be in a better position to analyze what's happening there, because of your regular contact with unembedded Iraqi journalists."
As WSI 2008 unfolds, look for “verification” from Ali al-Fadhily, who co-authored "Iraq: Killer of U.S. Soldiers Becomes a Hero" and other pieces with Jamail. Another will likely be Ahmed Ali, who co-authored "US the Biggest Producer of Terror" and "reports" from Diyala. Then there is Arkan Hamed who co-authored “Another US Cover Up Surfaces in Iraq”. Indications are that the unembedded “reporters” in Iraq give Jamail the story, who writes it up and gets it out, after first of course checking them as thoroughly as he did MacBeth’s bona fides and charges.

As with the Jesse MacBeth operation, while it lasted, expect the "credible" independent journalist to be actively involved with Winter Soldier, pushing atrocity themes and getting the information out, even to where it may assist the jihadist and insurgency recruiters. MacBeth was exposed because, oddly enough, Jamail’s push was so effective that the video became so widely circulated so quickly that it was brought to the almost immediate attention off the debunking milbloggers.

How many other Dahr Jamail efforts over the years never received such scrutiny, and is the absence of such scrutiny what allows conferring upon him that unwarranted aura of "credibility"?

Friday, March 21, 2008

What are IVAW and Dahr Jamail Hiding?

On March 12, the day before the Iraq Veterans Against the War launched their Winter Soldier Investigation (WSI) I posted IVAW: Time To Put Up – Or Retract.

At this point, they have not put up! I have just gone through the entire listing of Winter Soldier testifiers and that list is very notable for who is not there!

The people of this country and also those abroad, owing to the far reaching efforts of Jesse MacBeth's former de facto publicity agent, Dahr Jamail, are owed an explanation by both the IVAW and Jamail.

Speaking with a half dozen IVAW members identified by name in one of his dispatches ("What Have We done?") in August 2005, Dahr Jamail wrote:
"I type furiously for three hours, trying to keep up with the stories each of the men shared….about the atrocities of what they saw, and committed, while in Iraq."
According to Jamail his site, on which he posts his dispatches, was receiving over one million hits a day well before August 2005. The IVAW members present for those hours of atrocity "testimony" were Abdul Henderson, Alex Ryabov, Camilo Mejia, Harvey Tharp, Michael Hoffman and Charlie Anderson.

Now, with the Winter Soldier testimony having been given - what happened to those atrocity stories???

In that interview Jamail quoted Mejia as saying:
"I tortured guys...and I’m ashamed of that."
Yet Mejia has said otherwise at other times, and didn't make that claim even when it was in his interest to do so. See the previous post on Camilo Mejia.

Jamail quoted Harvey Tharp as saying:
“Most of what we’re talking about is war crimes…war crimes because they are directed by our government for power projection.”
But just last month Tharp was quoted in the Yemen Times as saying he had never personally witnessed any American atrocities in Iraq, but he had come to “know about certain cases”. He also stated he would not be testifying at WSI.

The other four, Abdul Henderson, Alex Ryabov, Michael Hoffman (IVAW co-founder) and Charlie Anderson, as far as I can find, also did not testify! The audios and transcripts have been going up since March 14, a week ago. None of those show up. If they did testify, I will correct that when I read or hear that testimony.

In any event, what happened to the three hours of atrocity stories Dahr Jamail claims to have been told by IVAW members who committed or witnessed them, and that he told the world about? Was someone lying? There was no three hours of first hand accounts of atrocity stories in all of Winter Soldier! For two and a half years the IVAW and Dahr Jamail have led people to believe, without correction, that those six veterans alone could tell hours of American atrocities that they had first hand knowledge of!

The public is owed an explanation. If the answer is that these IVAW members did not testify at WSI about these atrocities they committed or witnessed for fear of getting themselves or others in legal jeopardy, the question then is: why did you then tell them to a supposed journalist, without anonymity?

Smell test grade well below passing.

And of course, as IVAW has been broadcasting its extensive vetting of their members and their stories in preparation for WSI, did the claims by those members maybe not pass that vetting? If so, shouldn't that be made just as public as the claims that these men had enough first hand knowledge of atrocities to keep a journalist typing furiously for hours?

Perhaps Jamail will release, in the interest of full disclosure and journalistic ethics, those things he typed furiously for those three hours.

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

WSI 2008: Defining Atrocity Down

As early as August 2005 Dahr Jamail was writing what he was getting from IVAW members. I've pointed out that BLACKFIVE and Chickenhawk Express took apart a Jamail story from last October in which all four of his sources at a military base with thousands of troops were IVAW, two of them no longer on active duty. Here's another: the month before the MacBeth video went viral, Jamail posted this dispatch where again his sources are IVAW, notably Jody Casey and Michael Blake. Here Jamail gives a clear view of his standard for what constitutes a war crime.

Jamail quotes Marine Captain James Kimber from 2004 speaking to the Marines killing an insurgent who had been planting an IED, to the effect:

"The current policy in Iraq is to SHOOT ON SIGHT ANYBODY emplacing IEDs...."

Jamil interprets that, without any cause to do so, as follows:

"What is remarkable is that Kimber's blanket statement suggests that all Iraqis killed during the occupation, including those at Haditha, are killed because they are found 'emplacing' IEDs."

That is a leap that Evel Knievel would have balked at! This site links to a video that shows Marines wounding an insurgent planting an IED. Then the Marines finish him off, and break out cheering. Jamail writes:

"As for what happens if at some point Kimber is brought to trial for his crimes, Marjorie Cohn, a professor at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, has this to say, 'Self-defense is a defense to a homicide prosecution only if the shooter had an honest and reasonable belief that he had to defend himself or others from imminent death or great bodily injury. The question is how imminent the danger would be from a planted IED.'"

Self defence as a criminal defence? It's a war! If during WWII, American soldiers spotted German or Japanese soldiers moving artillery or mortars into position to attack Americans, were they required to wait until those devices were set to fire and the danger was 'imminent' before engaging and killing the enemy? What nonsense is this?

Jamail's dispatch tries to make the point that since the IED planter was wounded during the first episode of firing, the Marines were required to take him prisoner and not to kill him. Here's the thing:

Wounded men, even badly wounded men, can pull a trigger or depress a device that sets of an IED as Marines approach to take him in custody. For those on the left who cannot fathom this principle, I refer them to John Kerry, winner of the Silver Star in Vietnam. In the Boston Globe reporters' (Michael Kranish, Brian Mulrooney and Nina Easton) biography "John F. Kerry: The Complete Biography By The Boston Globe Reporters Who Know Him Best", in which the Vietnam War elements were largely taken from Kerry's own notes written at the time, the story is recounted about Kerry jumping off his Swift Boat to pursue a fleeing Viet Cong already wounded by machine gun fire. Kerry chased the man behind a "hooth", and killed him. That happened in the action that got Kerry his Silver Star. None of the Swift Vets charged that Kerry's killing of a wounded man was a war crime. To a man, they all agreed that even a badly wounded man who was carrying a grenade launcher was still a threat. During one of his Senatorial runs in the nineties, a reporter accused Kerry of a war crime for that, and men who later started the Swift Vets came to Kerry's aid. They did not endorse him for the Senate, as years later they balked at Kerry becoming Commander-in-Chief, but they also would not let a fellow Vietnam Vet be accused, falsely, of a war crime for killing a wounded man who could still pose a danger.

Simply, if those Marines who dispatched a wounded insurgent rather than walk up to a wounded man who may have been holding a detonator for an IED with which to kill those Marines approaching to take him prisoner committed a war crime, then so did John Kerry.

The other thing that got Jamail's dander up, and that of others, is that when the insurgent was killed, the Marines cheered. As Captain Kimber pointed out, by that time 200 of their fellow Marines and soldiers had been killed by such IEDs.

War and combat are emotional. During our Civil War, on the third day of the Battle of Gettysburg, twelve to fifteen thousand Confederate troops charged across an open field toward an entrenched Federal Army in what has become known as the failed Pickett's Charge. As the Federals lined up behind a stone wall mowed the Confederates down in droves, they were shouting and cheering "Fredericksburg! Give them Fredericksburg!" Half a year before, at Marye's Heights in Fredericksburg, it was the Confederates who were firing from behind the stone wall, mowing down the Federals. That cheering was understandable, not a war crime. The next day, July 4th, 1863, the Federals marched through Gettysburg with cheering and celebrating the bloody victory with fife and drums playing.

The next year, after the horrific Battle of the Wilderness, when Federal Commander Grant pointed the Army of the Potomac "left", meaning that rather than return for rest and resupply as was usual after a great battle, the Army was pursuing Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia and proceeding into greater carnage so as to finally end the thing, the soldiers cheered.


When the sailors on the U.S.S. Hornet were told that those large bombers on the carrier were headed for Tokyo in what became known as Doolittle's Raid, they cheered the coming bombing of the enemy.

During the Battle of Britain, when pilots among those whom Churchill called "so few" landed after downing five German bombers, their ground crews cheered.

The Washington Post has this on their website, after Al-Zarqawi was killed. The first is a question posted after viewing a video of a press briefing in Baghdad, followed by an answer from reporter Craig Whitlock:

"Washington, D.C.: While watching the press briefing, I was very much taken aback by the fact that the press openly cheered and applauded when al-Zarqawi's death was announced. Isn't it the press's job to report the news, not celebrate it?


Craig Whitlock: my understanding is that many of the people at the press briefing were Iraqi journalists."


I think Whitlock could have properly ended that reply with "were Iraqi" and left it at that.


To Dahr Jamail and his kind, U.S. Marines cheering the killing of an enemy who could have killed them or their brothers in arms was a horrid thing. Jamail does not always seem to see it that way, though. From a Dahr Jamail dispatch from June 2004:


"Over in Adhamiya we were dining on tasty kebabs on a sidewalk roughly 200 meters from the Adhamiya Palace, which is the US encampment in the heavily pro-resistance area of Baghdad. At 2pm three huge explosions sounded from inside the US base. Mortars, promptly followed by a huge black billowing plume of smoke from the target.


Everyone in the café was watching the smoke and spontaneous celebrations erupted as men clapped, cheered and yelled. “Here they go! The Americans have been killed!”


We continued eating, not missing a beat in our conversation. Abu Talat and I have grown very accustomed to the explosions that rock Baghdad on a regular basis these days. He looked at me and said: “You know, Dahr, I used to read about how the Lebanese got used to the bombs in Beirut. I never thought that could happen to me, yet here I am.”


“I know, and now me too,” I said, and we laughed together at the insanity of what has become our everyday life while working in occupied Baghdad."


NOTE: for an interview of Captain Kimber at BLACKFIVE.

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Dahr Jamail's Other Sources - It's Not Just IVAW

Just yesterday in Dahr Jamail's Sources, Here and There I asked what we could expect of Dahr Jamail’s sources in the Middle East given his blatant collusion with IVAW here in America to get "The Story" as it must be.

At Chickenhawk Express the blood is boiling regarding Jamail’s latest for Inter Press Service:

“IPS
Dahr Jamail
IRAQ: Killer of U.S. Soldiers Becomes a Hero
By Ali al-Fadhily and Dahr Jamail*

BAGHDAD, Jan 7 (IPS) - The recent killing of two U.S. soldiers by their Iraqi colleague has raised disturbing questions about U.S. military relations with the Iraqis they work with.

On Dec. 26, an Iraqi soldier opened fire on U.S. soldiers accompanying him during a joint military patrol in the northern Iraqi city Mosul. He killed the U.S. captain and another sergeant, and wounded three others, including an Iraqi interpreter.

Conflicting versions of the killing have arisen. Col. Hazim al-Juboory, uncle of the attacker Kaissar Saady al-Juboory, told IPS that his nephew at first watched the U.S. soldiers beat up an Iraqi woman. When he asked them to stop, they refused, so he opened fire.”

STOP: Who is this Col. Hazim al-Juboory, besides being the shooter’s uncle, and what is he a Colonel of? What we get from Jamail and al-Fadhily is this:

“Col. Juboory said Kaissar who had at first accepted collaboration with the U.S. forces ‘found the truth too bitter to put up with.’ The colonel said: ‘I worked with the Americans because being an army officer is my job and also because I was convinced they would help Iraqis. But 11 months was enough for me to realise that starving to death is more honourable than serving the occupiers. They were mean in every way’”

Eleven months? A Colonel? He’s a Saddam Hussein era Colonel. He’s not a Colonel is the post democracy Iraqi military. They kinda left that out.

Jamail and and al-Fadhily then cite and quote anonymous sources and witnesses aplenty. Then the Dynamic Duo get to:

“The Association of Muslim Scholars, a Sunni organisation, issued a statement saying the Iraqi soldier had shot the U.S. soldiers after he saw them beat up a pregnant woman.

‘His blood rose and he asked the occupying soldiers to stop beating the woman,’ they said in the statement. ‘Their answer through the translator was: 'We will do what we want. So he opened fire on them."

STOP THE PRESSES!

“The Association of Muslim Scholars, a Sunni organisation...”

Think timing. Dahr Jamail is all about timing. That's why he promoted the Jesse MacBeth video right after Murtha dropped the "in cold blood" bomb on the Haditha Marines. Here's a bit of a walk down memory lane with Dahr and Ali, say, September of 2006:

“U.S. Losing Control Fast
By Dahr Jamail and Ali Al-Fadhily
Inter Press Service
09/05/06 "IPS" -- -- RAMADI, The U.S. military has lost control over the volatile al-Anbar province, Iraqi police and residents say.”

For a sample from that article so as to get the feel of the thing:

"Al-Anbar borders Jordan, Syria and Saudi Arabia, and the resistance there will never stop as long as there are American soldiers on the ground."

“Salman said the U.S. military is working against itself. ‘Their actions ruin their goal because they use these huge, violent military operations which kill so many civilians, and make it impossible to calm down the people of al-Anbar.’"

“The resistance seems in control of the province now.”

“Long stretches of the 550km Baghdad-Amman highway which crosses al-Anbar are now controlled by resistance groups.”

"If we import any supplies for the U.S. Army or Iraqi government, the fighters will take it from us and sell it in the local market,"

“Eyewitnesses in Ramadi..say that the U.S. military recently asked citizens in al-Anbar to stop targeting them, and promised to withdraw to their bases in Haditha and Habaniyah (near Fallujah) soon...”

"But now the Americans are making us all angry because they are destroying our city."

"Hundreds of local policemen have quit the force after seeing that they are considered a legitimate target by fighters.."

“The U.S. forces seem to have no clear policy in the face of the sustained resistance.”

"The U.S. Army seems so confused in handling the security situation in Anbar"

Wow! That’s pretty darned dire!

Now for a slightly different perspective of that time period from Bill Roggio of the LongWarJournal, and remember that Dahr and Ali were writing in September of 2006:

“Anbar Rising
By Bill RoggioMay 11, 2007 2:38 PM
An overview of Anbar province from II MEF.
A status update on the province
The formation of the Sahawah Al Anbar, or Anbar Awakening, the grouping of Anbari tribes and former insurgents opposed to al Qaeda's Taliban like rule, traces back to last year, when al Qaeda in Iraq conducted its campaign of murder and intimidation throughout Anbar province. Sheik Abdul Sattar Al-Rishawi and his allies among the tribes and anti al Qaeda insurgent groups began forming alliances in the spring and summer of 2006. In September, the groups established the Jazeera Council in Ramadi, and began working more closely with Coalition forces to begin securing neighborhoods in Ramadi.”

Dahr and Ali wrote what they did, all that gloom and doom and hopelessness for "our side", including the Iraqis who were and became our allies, months after the Anbar Awakening had begun and was kicking into high gear! In the fall of 2006, the situation in al-Anbar was indeed bleak, but changing rapidly. Dahr and Ali, our intrepid and credible journalists somehow managed to not come across anyone who might have indicated to them that al-Anbar was about to erupt. That Anbar Awakening was a foreshadowing of an historical turning point in the war. The seething and beleaguered Iraqis, brutalized by AQI, were throwing in their lot with the persistent Americans who had not abandoned them or the province. Now, in January of 2008 we have Dahr and Ali quoting the Association of Muslim Scholars pushing a storyline that seeks to portray the killing of two American soldiers (Capt. Rowdy J. Inman and Sgt. Benjamin B. Portell) as the heroic and noble Iraqi defending women! Keep in mind perhaps that a bound Ken Bigley was beheaded by "noble" folks demanding the release of Muslim women held in detention. So what happened in Iraq a few weeks before this latest story by Dahr and Ali that involved the Association of Muslim Scholars:

“Sunni clerics turn on Association of Muslim Scholars
By Bill RoggioNovember 17, 2007 10:07 AM

Wednesday's closure of the headquarters of the Association of Muslim Scholars at the Umm al Quraa mosque marks a dramatic shift in the Sunni religious establishment. Prominent Sunni clerics, who once supported, justified, or remained silent about al Qaeda's terror tactics, have now turned on the leading Sunni religious establishment that supports al Qaeda in Iraq.”

And so we get a story that paints Americans as abusers of Iraqi women, and those Iraqis who are working with the Americans and coalition forces as traitors to their own, and the Association of Muslim Scholars simply got Dahr and Ali to get out their version for the sake of their own image rehabilitation with the Iraqi Sunnis.

Maybe some of those folks in IVAW just might ask themselves why it is that Dahr Jamail is so attentive to them! Couldn’t be that he thinks they are useful idiots, could it?

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Dahr Jamail: Credibility Deficit Disorder


Dahr Jamail is struggling to get back on track after his pet IVAW's Winter Soldier Investigation failed to produce the longed for evidence of "the Stygian depths of depravity and evil that US service personnel have sunk…" that Jamail's fans have been longing for since he touted Jesse MacBeth as the real deal.

Jamail has another co-authored piece (with Ali al-Fadhily) at IPS entitled IRAQ: Fever Named After Blackwater.

With his usual standard of fact checking demonstrated so aptly with his MacBeth promotion (see Jesse MacBeth to Winter Soldier: Exposing Dahr Jamail), Jamail and his partner write of a form of malaria:

" What Iraqis now call Blackwater fever is really a well-known medical condition, and while it has nothing to do with Blackwater Worldwide, Iraqis in al-Anbar province have decided to make the connection between the disease and the lethal U.S.-based company which has been responsible for the death of countless Iraqis. "
Jules Crittenden calls Jamail on it, pointing out that
falciparum malaria has been called Blackwater Fever since the 19th century! Crittenden also points out that a ten second Google search by the intrepid independent reporter would have shown the term being used as such in 1991.

Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit picks up the story as does Bruce Kesler of Democracy Project.

Hat tips to Bruce & Dan.

RELATED:

If you need to get the bad taste out after that, though, read Robin Boyd's The Heart of a Marine.

And remember, if you can possibly make it, there is the BNCOC graduation ceremony at Walter Reed tomorrow morning. These wounded soldiers who undertook that training while recovering from their injuries are an inspiration, and deserve to be honored.

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

More on Dahr Jamail/IVAW Collusion

Camilo Mejia became widely known as the first U.S. serviceman who refused to serve in Iraq. The Florida National Guardsman had served six months in Iraq in 2003, and came back to the U.S. on a two week leave. He refused to return to his unit or redeploy to Iraq, and was convicted of desertion in May 2005. He was sentenced to one year in prison, and was released after nine months.

In August of 2007, Mejia was elected to chair the Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW).

Two years before that, in August 2005, Mejia was one of several IVAW members interviewed by the intrepid and oh-so-credible unembedded reporter, Dahr Jamail. Jamail posted comments about that on his website, under the heading “What Have We Done?”:

“I type furiously for three hours, trying to keep up with the stories each of the menshared….about the atrocities of what they saw, and committed, while in Iraq.”

Oddly enough, in that furious three hours of typing up atrocity accounts, Jamail didn’t manage to slip a single incident into his comments with anything like date and time, place, who was involved or what specifically happened! Okay, not odd. Standard IVAW operations. When they do get into details, they get, like, caught. Jamail continues, and quotes Mejia:

“Camilo Mejia, an army staff sergeant who was sentenced to a year in military prison in May, 2004 for refusing to return to Iraq after being home on leave, talks openly about what he did there:

‘What it all comes down to is redemption for what was done there. I was turning ambulances away from going to hospitals, I killed civilians, I tortured guys…and I’m ashamed of that.’”

In a July 27, 2007 PBS interview, a month before filling Jamail in on all those atrocities, Majia had this to say:

“We're tasked with—with keeping prisoners on sleep deprivation for up to three or four days. And we did that by basically—terrorizing these people, by—by treating them and keeping them in subhuman conditions. We kept them hooded. We kept them tied. And we created loud sounds by—hitting the wall next to them with—huge sledge hammers to scare them into thinking that they were about to be killed by an explosions. And we put guns to their heads and charged them to make them believe that they were about to be executed in order to "soften them up" for interrogation. And after talking to—people who are experts in military law and international law, that this actually constitute war crimes. You know, that these actions that we took constitute—torture against a human being.”

Note all the “we did” and “these actions that we took constitute torture...”

However, more than two years before, Mejia was saying very different things. The following is from a March 2005 interview with the ever reliable Amy Goodman. The heading is “Jailed War Resister Camilo Mejia on His 9-Month Jail Sentence, Torture in Iraq and Why He Refused to Fight”, although the word “torture” doesn’t appear in the article.

AMY GOODMAN: You said you did some missions with P.O.W.s. What?

CAMILO MEJIA: When we first got to Iraq, first we went to the Baghdad International Airport and then we went to another place... which is called Al-Assad...they had an improvised detention camp for the detainees...areas made by concertina wire, which is worse than barbed wire, and they had military police units bringing in detainees. And then you had what we call spokes [ed: spooks?]...they pretty much made an initial assessment, and they decided who was or who wasn't an enemy combatant, and then we separated these people...Those who were deemed enemy combatants were kept on sleep deprivation...the easiest way to do that is just by, you know, yelling at these people, telling them to get up and to get down...Let them sleep for five seconds, so they will get up disoriented. Bang a sledgehammer on a wall to make it sound like an explosion, scare them. And if all of that fails then, you know, cock a .9 millimeter gun next to their ear, so as to make them believe that they're going to be executed. And then they will do anything that you want them to do. In that manner, keep them up for periods of 48 to 72 hours in order to soften them up for interrogation.

AMY GOODMAN: Did you do those things?

[ARE YOU READY FOR THE ANSWER TO THAT?]

CAMILO MEJIA: Not really, because we weren't there very long. We only were there for six hours with these enemy combatants and it was during the daytime. Some of the guys in my squad did yell at them on my orders. They used the sledgehammer. I don't think they used the gun. But then we were relieved and then they were taken away. It was enough to see who was going.on...

No matter whether those actions, depriving people of sleep, loud noises, yelling or even cocking a gun to someone’s ear constitutes torture in anyone’s view or not, Mejia just said he didn’t do those things! He says that on his orders, men in his squad yelled at people and made loud noises!

And even earlier, in May 2004, Democracy Now! had:

“Army Conscientious Objector Camilo Mejia Witnessed Torture of Iraqi Detainees in May 2003

Staff Sgt. Camilo Mejia faces court martial today for refusing to return to Iraq. He eventually applied for conscientious objector status in part because of the abuse of detainees he witnessed in Iraq, not in Abu Gharib but in another facility–Al Assad.”

Witnessed!?!? Abuse of detainees he witnessed? Years later and for Dahr Jamail this morphed into “I tortured guys”!

In mid 2005, Citizen Soldier reported this:

“Citizen Soldier's cooperating attorney, Louis Font, of Brookline, MA is preparing to appeal Camilo's conviction on two different legal grounds. First, the appeal argues that the court martial judge erred when he refused to allow defense lawyers to offer evidence of international law violations which Mejia had a legal duty to refuse. During Camilo's five months of combat in Iraq, he personally observed such violations on a regular basis. Therefore, his expectation of illegal orders was based on his actual experience--not on speculation.”

Note that Mejia “observed” violations and had “expectation” that if he returned to Iraq, he would be ordered to commit what he (supposedly) believed were violations of law. Again, nothing about Mejia actually doing these things, like torturing guys!

Jamail also quoted Mejia saying “I killed civilians”. Ready?

From the previously cited PBS interview from July 2007, here’s Mejia:

“We responded to a protest that was being held outside of a—a government building in Ar Ramadi. And we opened fire on a young man who threw a grenade at the compound that we were in. And this was the first time that I actually opened fire on a moving, breathing human being, and that as a result of that lost his life. I—I had been in the military over eight years. I was an infantry squad leader in war. And I can't say that all the training that I received in the military ever prepared me for that—for that crucial time in my life.”

[Ed: eight years in the military never prepared you to fire at a man throwing a grenade at you and your men? Is there a French National Guard? Continue...]

“When you return home, and you bring those memories, and—and you know that you've done these things, at least for myself it was really hard to conciliate that with the—the person that—that I was or at least that I was trying to be. It—it became just really hard to accept any justification for the—destruction of human life in war.”

Camilo, here’s the justification...that civilian?...he was throwing a #$&%& grenade at you and your men! It’s called self-defence! Mejia continues:

“The vast majority of the people—I mean, I'm talking about 30 out of 33 people that my unit alone killed are civilians. You know, you're not talking here about fire fights between the resistance fighters and the U.S. soldiers where one or two civilians get killed. And you can't say that because you signed up a military contract or but—that because war is ugly, you have basically a green light to commit all kinds of crimes. You know, I mean, the same thing could have been said by—Nazi soldiers when they killed six million Jews during World War II, that they too were following orders.”

That’s what Mejia calls crimes! The six week WWII action called Operation Overlord that began on June 6, 1944 (D-Day) killed an estimated 12,000 to as many as 20,000 French civilians. Most were killed by Allied aerial and naval bombardment. That also began the liberation of France, and not even the French call that an atrocity. Mejia conveniently overlooks that the Holocaust was intentional murder of civlians not related to the war effort, as opposed to civilians being tragically killed during combat.

So, while Dahr Jamail was furiously typing for those hours, documenting those atrocities attested to by the IVAW folks, any wonder he left out any - details?

Saturday, February 23, 2008

IVAW & Media: Tactics, Allies & Critics


Media at WSI, March 2008:

IVAW & Dahr Jamail:

IVAW Credibility Problems:

IVAW In The News:

Sparing Us the Details:

IVAW Watchers & Critics:
Back to Obiter Dictum Main.

LU03122008

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Winter Soldier: A Theatrical Review

The Iraq Veterans Against the War’s (IVAW) much touted Winter Soldier Investigation – Iraq and Afghanistan (March 13-16) has concluded not with a bang but with a whimper.

Both Jonn Lilyea of This Ain’t Hell and TSO (Thus Spake Ortner) of The Sniper who live-blogged the event delivered AARs (After Action Reports). I'm going to address it more in the form of a review, what one writes for, well, theatre.

Details of individual and panel performances are to come, but for now, like many reviews, I'm going to focus substantially on audience reaction.

The show flopped!

The theatrical as opposed to investigative endeavor has to have been a huge disappointment to many who had high hopes for and a lot riding on the show. WSI simply failed to deliver.

No one can be more disappointed than Dahr Jamail, the “unembedded reporter” and “independent journalist” who at one time played the role of de facto press agent for Jesse Macbeth, the atrocity charge spewing IVAW fraud outed in 2006. Jamail has published an article on WSI for IPS. While Jamail quotes five WSI testifiers about actions and events in Iraq, some of which if true come up to the level of crimes, the amazing thing is that this article is an incredible climb-down for Jamail! His atrocity charge laden pieces have been flowing for years with far more lurid and damning claims than anything he has taken from WSI! Culling the most atrocious from the testimony in the statements by Vincent Emmanuel, Garret Reppenhagen, Jason Wayne Lemue, John Michael Turner and Jason Washburn, Jamail did not come anywhere close to what he has trumpeted in the past, for example, in May 2006 Jamail wrote "Countless My Lais in Iraq", claiming:
"The media feeding frenzy around what has been referred to as "Iraq's My Lai" has become frenetic. Focus on U.S. Marines slaughtering at least 20 civilians in Haditha last November is reminiscent of the media spasm around the ‘scandal’ of Abu Ghraib during April and May 2004…countless atrocities continue daily...Torture did not stop simply because the media finally decided...to cover the story, and the daily slaughter of Iraqi civilians by U.S. forces and U.S.-backed Iraqi ‘security’ forces had not stopped either."
There has been a longing on the anti-war left, a deep yearning, for that story or series of stories that would nail the American military and its killbot minions as evil incarnate. We saw signs of that with the fraudulent MacBeth video, as with this from the producer, Randy Rowland who wrote in an e-mail:
"After all, the news these days is about a Marine squad who are accused of exactly this same behavior [at Haditha]. Jesse's story would clearly show the Marine story to be common policy, rather than a squad of loose cannons..."
Or the Dissident Voice on the same subject, spitting spittle and crying for Lord MacBeth to rescue us all from Bushitler:
"If the [MacBeth] video gets widespread exposure, it is unfathomable that support for a US troop presence in Iraq could be sustained...It is a video that should number the days of the Bush administration...we hear the shaken ex-army ranger and Iraq war veteran Jessie MacBeth admit to the Stygian depths of depravity and evil that US service personnel have sunk…"
Say what you will about WSI 2008, it didn't reach those longed for Stygian depths of depravity by our troops!

Indication was given over a month ago that the Knights of the IVAW would not deliver the atrocity Holy Grail the left desired. The old hands at Vietnam Veterans Against the War must also be disappointed, after having broadcast:
This spring, the largest gathering of veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan will share their experiences in a public investigation called Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan. Providing testimonies to war crimes the United States perpetuates with the ongoing wars and occupations...
Oddly enough, the IVAW backed off that "largest gathering of U.S. veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan…” when challenged on it months ago. The claimed number of "testifiers" also went from over one hundred to under fifty. Less than half of those could be considered to have testified to anything like atrocities.

Readers of the Yemen Times had to be disappointed, as IVAW's Harvey Tharp sang the siren song only last month, even if the later abridged version:
"I’m a member of the Iraq Veterans Against the War. As the only officer who has joined, I’m the highest ranked...I’m going to Washington, D.C. for the winter soldier hearings from March 13-16. Fifty members from the Iraq Veterans Against the War will testify to war crimes they witnessed or even participated in and I’ll be there in support."
And of course, the most internationally well known and published [possibly former] IVAW member and co-founder, Jimmy Massey was a no show! Massey fans in Malaysia, Venezuela, France and Cuba must be wondering what happened!

It is at least possible (okay, highly probable) that the vetting process IVAW said they were going through dwindled their earlier presumed numbers. DemocracyNow! also didn't get what they hoped for:
Winter Soldier: Hundreds of Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Gather to Testify in Echo of 1971 Vietnam Hearings

Hundreds of veterans and active-duty soldiers of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are gathering today for the Winter Soldier hearings. The soldiers plan to give eyewitness accounts of the occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Channeling Mel Gibson's William Wallace from Braveheart, "It was more like fifty!".

Bruce Kesler at the Democracy Project reports in Elmer Gantry Needed At Winter Soldier II (Even Feminist Supporters PO'd) this "ouch!" quote from a feminist site:

Saturday's hearings opened with the Divide To Conquer: Gender and Sexuality in the Military. From the title of the panel, we were looking forward to this panel….

The panel was an embarrassment….

A panel at Winter Soldiers promises testimony. Testimony is based on what you saw. A witness in a court of a law attempting to 'testify' to what they themselves didn't witness would be reduced to rubble under cross examination. For this panel, such requirements were largely tossed out….
Other fans are besides themselves that their stars didn't draw the crowds, or the right crowds! From OpEd News:
What is the Difference Between the Mainstream Media and Goebbels' Ministry of Propaganda?

In America, Truth gets slaughtered daily in the mainstream media, just like it was in Nazi Germany. The American media has always taken great umbrage in condemning the perfidy of the German people who supported the deadly war policies of Hitler, yet they whistle past the graveyard while ignoring another holocaust going on in Iraq, not to mention Afghanistan. Nowhere is this more evident than in their blackout of WINTER SOLDIER.
Also at OpEd News:
WINTER SOLDIER BLACKOUT CONTINUES: Look in the Mirror America!!!!!

By Kevin Stoda, Kuwait
As there are reports across the globe of a USA-wide blackout of major media news from the WINTER SOLDIERS presentations or soldiers’ testimonies on the Iraq and Afghanistan War at the Labor College outside of Washington D.C. this week...
Only the independent media, like REAL NEWS NETWORK...is doing its job.
Otherwise, only the Huffington News seems to have noticed this gaping absence, despite complaints appearing all over the web, like on YAHOO discussion lists.
Even the BBC’s coverage has not been as good as one would expect from a respected international news network.
Even the light comedyIVAW tried didn't make a splash, like Camilo Mejia going from his squad guarding detainees for six hours to him running a POW camp, or Geoff Millard's clicking the mouse to advance Power Point slides evolving into him giving a briefing to generals and colonels! There were more than a few testifiers who spoke of bad actions like taking pot shots at cars and carrying shovels around to plant evidence of IED emplacement near the bodies of those killed and insisted these things were commonplace, the usual. Well, commonplace and usual for exactly whom? Squad, platoon, company, battalion, regiment, division, what? Because if these things were true and that common and usual, how come all the testifiers didn't testify to the same common and usual things? In professinal theatre and movies they have a person assigned to the task of assuring continuity, such as the same buttons on the shirt buttoned and unbuttoned scene to scene and shot to shot. WSI missed that.

And milbloggers TSO and Jonn Lilyea didn't help the image situation of 'we care for the troops' when they reported that when the panel began on veteran care, the mass of the audience scattered to other parts!

Possibly the biggest indication of how badly the show flopped? Only moments ago, a Google search for "Winter Soldier" brought up this:

Yup, the number one return on Google for "Winter Soldier" is Scott Swett's WinterSoldier.com site, the one that has all that debunking information about the Kerryfest of 1971!

As Thus Spake Ortner might cry, "Oh the huge manitees!"